Has the COVID Curve Peaked?

OCCAM’S MALLET

Occam’s Razor: the preference for simplicity in the scientific method [1]
Occam’s Mallet: the preference for convoluted conspiracy, rather than coincidence, in the political method.

Our COVID Estimate of Situation Web Page:
www.TruthAboutCoronavirus.com

“Official narratives strain credulity in the same way that science for hire propaganda asks us to believe irrational, unscientific “facts” simply because they are often repeated. When “conspiracy” explains the facts better than the official narrative Occam’s Mallet is your tool of thought. When the scientific method is pretzeled to sell Big Pharam vaccine drug megadeath, Occam’s Mallet is your survival tool.”  Dr. Rima

Dr. Rima Recommends Nano Silver 10 PPM

Today we have a little lesson in science and politics.

I tell the story to illustrate my point that science and politics don’t particularly mix. Thus I assert what we might call Occam’s Mallet, the idea that, in politics when choosing between coincidence (as in, say, the COVID novel virus outbreak that started in Wuhan, China, allegedly at the “wet market” that was coincidentally less than 1,000 feet from China’s premiere Bioweapons Lab) and conspiracy (that either the Chinese authorities, or some dissident scientist, for contrary reasons, released the weaponized virus through the market, or someone sold some surplus test bats from the lab on the market, in good Chinese crony capitalist style) we should prefer the conspiracy explanation to the coincidence. And probably the most convoluted conspiracy… maybe the one that says it was a combination of intentional-accidental release from the lab and the new 5G cell phone system in Wuhan that were responsible, resulting in — are you ready? — the abrupt ending of the growing Chinese anti-Communist demonstrations that had started in Hong Kong.

That’s politics for you.

Now here’s an interesting link: https://google.org/crisisresponse/covid19-map — this is a real time map with listing of all the major COVID outbreaks during the present declared pandemic. While China and South Korea appear to be over the worst of the disease, and Spain and Italy seem at the very peak, where is the USA. At peak? Before peak? After peak?

These were the questions my good friend Robert Goodman, PhD (Biochemistry) took up with a couple other thinkers, including Dr. Rima Laibow.

Below is a couple days’ email chain trying to determine where the USA was on the typical sine wave of disease, not just by looking at the number of cases or even the number of deaths, but also at the rate of increase in the number of deaths.

Dr. Goodman concludes that the increase in the rate of increase in the USA peaked some days ago. Dr. Laibow points out that “GIGO” — Garbage In, Garbage Out — applies here, since the test used to determine whether someone is suffering from COVID or from some other respiratory infection gives up to an 80% false positive result!

What do we know scientifically about where the USA is “on the curve”? What is the simplest explanation… or should we opt for the most convoluted explanation? Is it science or politics?

Well, a least we have plenty of time on our hands to ponder these matters while we self-shield. And time to support our immune systems with Dr. Rima Recommends Nano Silver 10 PPM.

Share this message with this link:  http://www.opensourcetruth.com/has-the-covid-curve-peaked/

(1) ———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Dr. Bob
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 17:42:53 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: the data in the USA
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/cases-in-us.html#epi-curve

Just look thru March 14, the last date to which CDC doesn’t expect to add
to. Peak incidence passed on March 11 — BEFORE all these crazy control
measures. When the year’s wrapped up, Covid-19 will have hardly made a
blip on the TOTAL pneumonia figures — cases or deaths — for the USA.

(2) ———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Dr. Bob
Date: Mar 25, 2020, 11:40 PM (18 hours ago)
Subject: the data in the USA

> OK. Will wait for more data. Ralph

Unfortunately on Tuesday, March 24th, the day after I sent that e-mail,
CDC changed their measuring stick. First they included ESTIMATED illness
onset dates, while previously they’d used only KNOWN onset dates. Then
they started looking back 10 instead of 9 days, so they said they could
add to the numbers as early as March 14. So the March 11 peak
disappeared.

Then today, Wednesday, March 25th, they stopped updating entirely.
Previously every weekday shortly after 4 PM, new data appeared. It looks
like a peak may have been hit on March 13th, but we’d’ve needed at least
another day or two to be sure, and now I don’t know when the data will be
forthcoming. It’s almost midnight and it’s still not there for March 25th.

JS
12:04 AM (17 hours ago)
to Robert, me

Yeah, they can’t publish the actual numbers because people will know the peek is substantially over.
They had to pass all the laws and bills to erode the bill of rights further than the patriot act did.

(3) ———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Dr. Bob
Date: Wed, Mar 25, 9:17 PM (2 days ago)
Subject: the data in the USA

Yesterday CDC changed the measuring stick, including ESTIMATED (inferred)
onset dates of cases, and extended the add-to dates farther back, to March
14, which made the March 11 peak disappear. Today they didn’t update
their data, so they’re still only thru March 24. Could they be hiding
good news? From what I could see with their new data yesterday, a peak
still might’ve been hit on March 13, but without the down side of the
curve, it can’t be told.

(3) ———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Dr. Bob
Date: 24, 2020, 2:27 PM (2 days ago)
Subject: the data in the USA

So what did they do today? They changed the measuring stick to make it no
longer appear there was a peak!

“Note: On March 24, CDC updated the data included in this figure to
include estimated illness onset date.”

(4) ———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Dr. Rima
Date: Thu, Mar 26, 9:33 PM
Subject: the data in the USA

Gentlemen,

GIGO: Garbage In, Garbage Out.  My investigations suggests very strongly that the tests are inaccurate (up to 80% false positive, God knows what % false negative, so what, exactly, are we measuring with tests that are unavailable and inaccurate when they are available?

I think the reality of the illness is one thing (people do get sick and die) but the theater of the “response” is pure totalitarian theater.

Hype, hypocrisy and oligarchic wet-dreaming

God help us all.

The fact that Nano Silver 10 PPM is incredibly effective in supporting immune function in the presence of corona viruses has actually been presented to the Congress of the United Sates which has chosen to act as if that information was never within its sights.

I repeat: God Help Us All!!

Yours in health and freedom,

Dr. Rima